What happened to the old science of morality?

Hi there,

Just one month ago, the Edge Foundation sponsored a fascinating seminar on “the new science of morality”. The big names of neuro-morality attended, including Jonathan Haidt, Sam Harris, Roy Baumeister, Paul Bloom, and Marc Hauser. Reporters from leading newspapers came as well and spread the word.

One of these luminaries, Marc Hauser, led a symposium on how thinking about morality as an evolved system of neurological rules could be used to make the world a better place, make governments work better, improve corporate governance, law, the internet, and so on.

Unfortunately, as we report below, Marc Hauser is now caught up in his own moral conundrum. His employer, Harvard University, has admitted that he was guilty of eight instances of academic misconduct. The nature of these offences is not altogether clear, but they seem to involve faking data for his work on animal cognition.

Speaking personally, I have always had reservations about neuro-morality. Reducing ethics to genetics and neurology eliminates free will and radically changes the nature of what it means to be human.

Academic misconduct is not exactly a hanging offence. However, if Hauser’s new science is true, rational morality consists of following arbitrary social conventions. It is a bit unsettling to learn that a prophet of an ethical revolution has been ignoring the fairly basic conventions of academic research. It will be interesting to see how the new science of morality develops from here.


Michael Cook


comments powered by Disqus

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed