It is inevitable that bioethics intersects with politics. This week US President Donald Trump was the main attraction at the 47th March for Life in Washington DC. This is an annual event commemorating Roe v Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision which identified a right to abortion in the Constitution.
The President delivered an unabashed endorsement of the pro-life movement, although, as the media were quick to point out, he had once been firmly pro-choice. He framed his attack pro-life rhetoric in religious terms, no doubt to bolster his credentials with Evangelicals and Catholics.
Unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House. And as the Bible tells us, each person is “wonderfully made.”
Never slow to attack his Democrat foes, he slammed them for allegedly embracing “the most radical and extreme positions taken and seen in this country for years, and decades — and you can even say ‘for centuries’. … Nearly every top Democrat in Congress now supports taxpayer-funded abortion, all the way up until the moment of birth.”
Pro-choice figures focused on the political angle to the March during Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate. The president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, Ilyse Hogue, tweeted that the president’s speech was “a desperate attempt to divert attention from his criminal presidency and fire up his radical base”.
This article is published by
and BioEdge under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.