Redefining the rules of war

Fires burn in part of the MSF hospital after air strike on October 3 (AFP: MSF)   

Medecins San Frontieres has accused the US special forces of “war crimes” after an American AC-130 gunship attacked a field hospital in the northern Afghan city of Kunduz in early October.

According to MSF, the incident left at least 30 staff and patients dead. During the one hour attack, “patients burned in their beds, medical staff were decapitated and lost limbs, and others were shot by the circling AC-130 gunship while fleeing the burning building”.

MSF staff frantically try to contact NATO during the attack, but the response was slow. The US government later apologised, but MSF are not satisfied and is demanding a full investigation.

MSF believes that the attack may have been deliberate, and have called on the nations of the world to declare “if the rules of war still apply”: “We need a clear commitment that the act of providing medical care will never make us a target.”

In an opinion piece in Newsweek, MSF UK executive director Vickie Hawkins further emphasised the seriousness of the situation. Discussing a litany of attacks in the past two years, she asked,

“What are medical workers from Afghanistan to Syria, Yemen and beyond to do if their protection is stripped from them? What does it mean for patients if their ability to access medical care is destroyed?” 

MORE ON THESE TOPICS | ethics of war, medicine, war

This article is published by Xavier Symons and BioEdge under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

comments powered by Disqus