Mary Stopes staff pressured into pursuing abortions


As Britain marks the 50th anniversary of the 1967 Abortion Act, one of the country’s major abortion providers has gone into damage control after allegations of coercive staff performance policies.

The UK’s Care Quality Commission (CQC) this month released the results of a comprehensive inspection of Marie Stopes’ Maidstone clinic — an abortion facility in a country town. The report suggests that staff from the facility were being pressured into into “encouraging” women to have abortions. The report states:

“Staff [from the Marie Stopes’ Maidstone clinic] expressed concern that they were assessed and bonuses were paid based on performance against Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for patients leaving the centre with long acting reversible contraception and “Did not proceed”. Staff felt that this corporate focus on achieving KPIs worked against the concept of patient choice”.

Inspectors uncovered a document referring to a “company-wide focus” on women who weren't going ahead with abortions, who were referred to as “Did Not Proceed” patients. Where a patient of less than 5 weeks and three days gestation had decided not to go ahead with the termination, they were being called by staff and offered a later appointment.

Staff from the facility expressed concern that the clinic had a "very target driven culture”, while one staff member described it as “feeling like a hamster in a wheel” and said the word, “Cattle market” came up quite a lot.

Marie Stopes UK managing director Richard Bentley strenuously denied the accusations: "[none of our] KPIs relate to client numbers, and it is untrue that any member of our staff receives a performance related bonus for the number of clients they treat”. 

But Conservative MP Fiona Bruce said the allegations indicate a “conveyer-belt culture” in Britain’s abortion industry: 

“It is shocking to hear that, at what is often such a difficult and stressful moment, abortion clinics are taking advantage of pregnant women by seeking to do as many abortions as they can, rather than seeking to give genuine, non-directional counselling and advice.”




MORE ON THESE TOPICS | abortion, clinical ethics, consent, professional ethics, uk

This article is published by Xavier Symons and BioEdge under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

 
 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 
comments powered by Disqus