Liverpool Care Pathway slammed in BMJ


The highly controversial Liverpool Care Pathway has been slammed in the British Medical Journal. In a scathing letter, psychiatrist Eugene Breen has criticised the protocol as vague and easily abused. “There is no quality control or accountability and there are no penalties,” he wrote. He concluded that “It is impossible to control such a programme with any respectable level of professionalism or care for the person involved”. 

The letter comes in the wake of three years of intense media scrutiny and public debate. The LCP - a palliative care protocol for dying patients in British hospitals - has been variously labelled ‘compassionate’, ‘poorly implemented’, ‘agenda driven’ and ‘euthanasia-lite’. The protocol has been adopted by over 85% of National Health Service Trusts in England.

Dr Breen’s letter was written in response to a BMJ study on the attitudes of specialists towards the LCP. Out of the 563 respondents, 98% did not think that pressure on beds or other resources had influenced decisions to use the pathway for end of life care. But 57% of respondents thought that negative media coverage had led to a decline in the use of the LCP. 

MORE ON THESE TOPICS | end-of-life care, Liverpool Care Pathway

This article is published by Xavier Symons and BioEdge under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

comments powered by Disqus