When Secretary of State John Kerry announced that the US had evidence of chemical weapons use in Syria, he was relying heavily on information from Doctors Without Borders. This information came close to never being released. As the New York Times revealed this week, Doctors Without Borders (MSF) officials laboured over whether to publish a statement, considering that doctors were already being targeted by the Syrian army.
However, after convening a conference to debate the matter, it was eventually decided that the information was "too big" and "too credible" to be withheld.
Stephen Morrison, a global health expert at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, has praised MSF for publishing the statement: “It was very risky, and a tough call, and things could have gotten ugly for them.”
However, some organisations are wary of overstepping their role of providing medical care. The International Red Cross, for example, has a policy of avoiding partisanship. Like many other organisations, they are concerned that political involvement could potential prevent them from carrying out their work in a country.
This article is published by
and BioEdge under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines
. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us
for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.