As the Terri Schiavo case showed, the status of advanced directives can be controversial. But they are used – in various countries – to authorize withdrawal of life-support and even euthanasia. How about a wedding?
A controversial case before an Illinois District Court has generated debate about the limits of advance directives. John Morris, 63, the fiancé of Collette Purifoy, suffered an anoxic brain injury during an operation November 2009, leaving him in a vegetative state. Just before the operation, he had proposed to Purifoy, his partner for 30 years. Now Purifoy wants to marry Morris, despite his unconsciousness.
Illinois law requires that both individuals appear before a county clerk and sign the marriage application - something Morris is obviously unable to do. The state has refused the certificate because of this.
Practical Ethics writer Luke Davies criticised the decision. Surrogate decision makers should be able to be proxies for an unconscious person - we deny the autonomy of the person if we ignore the proxy: "If... surrogate decision-making should primarily serve as a way of promoting the autonomy of the person for whom decisions are being made, then ignoring such wishes would constitute a violation of that person’s autonomy", he said.
Winebago County Clerk Margie Mullins -- who first refused to give the couple the certificate -- argued that they were simply unable to enter into a marriage. "the other party involved would have no idea what’s going on," she said. "I just think that is not what marriage is supposed to be about."
This article is published by
and BioEdge under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines
. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us
for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.