October
13
 

More Nobel links to bioethics

Yes, there is a bioethical angle to another of this week’s Nobel Prize announcements. The latest novel by Chinese novelist Mo Yan, the 2012 laureate for literature, is Wa (or Frogs, published in 2009; translated into French in 2011). It is a searing critique of the one-child policy.

There is no escaping controversy over Nobel Prizes. Although Mo Yan (whose real name is Guan Moye) is one of China’s best-selling novelists, he is a member of the Communist Party and he seldom critiques human rights abuses. In 2000, writer and critic Gao Xingjian won the literature prize, but he has lived in France since 1987. In 2010 democratic activist Liu Xiaobo won the Nobel Peace Prize and is still in jail. Artist and activist Ai Weiwei declared that Mo Yan’s award was "shameful".

Perhaps Mo Yan chooses his targets. Wa – which has been translated into French, but not English – was inspired by the life of the author’s aunt, a obstetrician who headed up a family planning unit in a rural county. “Wa” sound the same as “baby” in Mandarin, a pun which Mo Yan uses to good effect. The doctor hates the croaking of frogs.

Obeying the slogan “One is not too short, two is just what is needed, three is one too many,” the doctor does 2,000 abortions, forces people to have IUDs, vasectomies and tubal ligations and runs a network of spies to discover unauthorized pregnancies.

An enterprise breeding frogs is a cover for recruiting surrogate mothers. One woman character is severely disfigured in a fire; she is inseminated to pay for her father’s medical expenses. Women’s bodies become commodities.

Mo Yan is far from being a strait-laced Puritan. Most of his novels are bawdy, sprawling exercises in magical realism, reminiscent of Gabriel Garcia Marquez or William Faulkner, lurching from tragedy to farce. Nonetheless, he abhors the one-child policy. He told a Hong Kong TV station in 2010 (translated by LifeNews.com):

“I personally believe the one-child policy is a bad policy. If there were no one-child policy, I would have two or three children.”

“When I was serving in the army, I was promoted to the rank of officer. There was another officer in the army who lost his rank… because he had a second child. I was afraid I would receive the same punishment, so I chose not to have another child. If it were not for my own selfish ambition, I would have let my wife have a second or even a third baby. I used a very high-sounding rationale to convince her we needed to abort the baby: we had to follow the Party’s policy and nation’s policy. This has become an eternal scar in the deepest part of my heart… It became a big shadow in my heart.”



This article is published by Michael Cook and BioEdge.org under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

comments powered by Disqus
 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed


 Recent Posts
Queensland decriminalises abortion
21 Oct 2018
Harvard Calls for Retraction of Dozens of Studies by Noted Cardiac Researcher
20 Oct 2018
Major American medical association drops opposition to euthanasia
20 Oct 2018
Social prescribing and the bioethics of loneliness
20 Oct 2018
Should we be doing more to prepare for the next pandemic?
20 Oct 2018

Home | About Us | Contact Us | rss RSS | Archive | Bookmark and Share | michael@bioedge.org

BioEdge - New Media Foundation Ltd © 2004 - 2009 All rights reserved -- Powered by Encyclomedia