August
14
  3:03:53 PM

Will the new science of morality make us more moral? Perhaps not.

Morality is a tricky business. If you are an expert in preaching about it, people tend to hold you to a higher standard of probity. Perhaps this is what has made allegations of academic misconduct against one of the leading exponents of the “new science of morality” so disturbing for Bostonians

Harvard professor Marc D. Hauser has persuasively argued that no action is inherently wrong. "We generally do not commit wrong acts because we recognize that they are wrong and because we do not want to pay the emotional price of doing something we perceive as wrong," he says. As an evolutionary biologist, he is fascinated by the idea of evil and thinks that his research can shed light on its origin and its attraction. “I believe that science, and scientists, have an important role to play in shaping the moral agenda. We have an obligation to use facts and reason to… click here to read whole article and make comments




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 from the editor: Pointed Remarks
Do we need a morality pill?
4 Feb 2012
Should we scrap the dead donor rule?
28 Jan 2012
The bioethics of intellectual disability
21 Jan 2012

 Be a fan of BioEdge on Facebook

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Neuroscience as the military’s new weapon
9 Feb 2012
Single-embryo transfers? Fugedaboudit, says NY IVF doctor
9 Feb 2012
Dutch celebrate a decade of euthanasia with a film festival
6 Feb 2012
Lost in surrogacy’s Bermuda Triangle
3 Feb 2012
Scores of UK patients die with bedsores, infections and malnutrition
3 Feb 2012

 Tags
human drama, Canada, US, China, UK, IVF, genetic testing, organ trafficking, sex selection, informed consent, organ donation, HFEA, embryonic stem cells, commercialization, India, assisted suicide, Australia, research, Down syndrome, sperm donation, euthanasia, law, abortion, surrogacy, Netherlands, clinical trials, neuroscience, suicide, stem cells, bioethics,