August
21
  5:39:21 PM

Do we need more “neuroscepticism”?

Last year British doctor and philosopher Raymond Tallis published a cranky article in The New Humanist about “neurotrash” which complained about the exuberant proliferation of neuros: “If you come across a new discipline with the prefix ‘neuro’ and it is not to do with the nervous system itself, switch on your bullshit detector. If it has society in its sights, reach for your gun. Bring on the neurosceptics.”

Heeding his summons, Eran Klein, of Oregon Health and Sciences University, has published an article in the journal Neuroethics entitled “Is There a Need for Clinical Neuroskepticism?”

“It is far from clear that a future world in which everyone wears neurospectacles is the best one available to us. Neuroscience has changed the way we understand ourselves and no doubt will continue to do so, often for the better. But it provides just one way to encounter the world. Enveloping ourselves in… click here to read whole article and make comments




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 from the editor: Pointed Remarks
Do we need a morality pill?
4 Feb 2012
Should we scrap the dead donor rule?
28 Jan 2012
The bioethics of intellectual disability
21 Jan 2012

 Be a fan of BioEdge on Facebook

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Neuroscience as the military’s new weapon
9 Feb 2012
Single-embryo transfers? Fugedaboudit, says NY IVF doctor
9 Feb 2012
Dutch celebrate a decade of euthanasia with a film festival
6 Feb 2012
Lost in surrogacy’s Bermuda Triangle
3 Feb 2012
Scores of UK patients die with bedsores, infections and malnutrition
3 Feb 2012

 Tags
suicide, UK, human drama, clinical trials, assisted suicide, commercialization, informed consent, euthanasia, sex selection, IVF, Canada, Down syndrome, Australia, abortion, China, embryonic stem cells, neuroscience, HFEA, surrogacy, organ trafficking, law, stem cells, sperm donation, Netherlands, genetic testing, India, US, research, bioethics, organ donation,