Peer Review


“But has it been peer-reviewed?”

Michael Cook | 30 July 2011
A peer-reviewed study is commonly regarded as the gold standard for truth and trustworthiness in scientific research. However, after several prominent scandals involving suggestions of research fraud, concern about its usefulness has spread beyond academe. So much so that a committee of the UK’s House of Commons has just published a report on the peer review process. Since the government is a major funder of research, its opinions matter.

Stem cell scientists’ latest nemesis: each other

Jared Yee | 13 February 2010
Office politics invade scientific research
 
 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 Best of the web