April
02
  10:35:00 PM

Shadow of Hwang over stem cell research

Facebook   Twitter   Share
tags:

Much like the sinister Nazgûl in the Lord of the Rings, the spectre of fraudster Hwang Woo-suk hovers over stem cell research. This time his chilling shadow fell on its most recent star, Japanese researcher Shinya Yamanaka. Yamanaka become a key player almost overnight with a series of stunning papers showing that it was possible to create embryonic-like stem cells without destroying embryos. His work may make embryonic stem cell research a dead end, say its opponents. And enthusiasm for his induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) is growing by the day in laboratories around the world.

However, it seems that in his haste to publish results, Yamanaka made a couple of small mistakes in his latest paper, published online on February 14 in the journal Science. Two weeks later, an anonymous email was sent to journal editors, science journalists and scientists pointing out the errors. Someone called “Reprogrammer Yamanaka” pointed out “embarrassing inconsistencies” and insisted that his team “either retract their paper or provide meticulous and thorough new analysis”.

Had the Nazgûl stabbed Frodo? It seems not, says Nature in a recent editorial. “Happily, he has since given plausible explanations for the mistakes, and has effectively argued that they do not affect the article’s central conclusion -- thus heading off worries (and one unsubstantiated accusation) that the errors signalled deeper problems with the article.”

In fact, the cold breath of the Korean ringwraith might have cheered scientists threatened by Yamanaka’s technique. If it succeeds, they may not be to muster the PR power to convince a sceptical public to authorise and fund therapeutic cloning. Stem cell scientist Alan Trounson, wrote in Nature Reports Stem Cells that many journalists were already asking: "Isn't the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) out of business now that the Yamanaka and Thomson papers show human fibroblasts can be induced to pluripotency?" He responded cheerily that embryonic stem cells remain the “gold standard” in all stem cell research. And the president of the International Society for Stem Cell Research, George Daley, recently declared, “There will never be a time when we don’t need human embryo research.”

However, not all of his colleagues feel the same way. In a Nature article which was aimed at stripping iPS cells of their glamour, the scientist who first isolated human embryonic stem cells, James Thomson, of the University of Wisconsin, foresees the end of an era. “If you can’t tell the difference between iPS cells and embryonic stem cells, the embryonic stem cells will turn out to be an historical anomaly,” he says. ~ Nature, Mar 27; Nature Reports Stem Cells, Jan 24; Alameda Times Star, Mar 20



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
get posts by email or
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 upcoming events

Passport to Parenthood: Evidence and Ethics behind Cross-Border Reproductive Care
November 24, 2010, London
Progress Educational Trust asks whether fertility tourism is a problem or a solution.

10th World Congress of Bioethics
July 28-31, 2010, Singapore
Bioethics in a Globalised World

Created in the Image of God: realities and challenges in caring for the human person
April 30 - May 2, 2010, Montreal
AGM of Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians’ Societies; featured speakers include Edmund Pellegrino and Margaret Somerville.

Consequences of the Bio-Medical Revolution
May 1, 2010, Biola University, La Mirada, CA
Helping nurses understand technological advances in health care and their ethical consequences.

Fertility, Infertility and Gender
June 16-18, 2010, Maynooth, Ireland (near Dublin)
Sponsored by the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Oxford.


 Best of the web

Artificially Conceiving a Bad Romantic Comedy
First Things
Why sperm donation generates Hollywood bombs.

Obama’s Illegal Stem-Cell Policy
Public Discourse
Obama’s stem-cell policy is not only contrary to sound reason and good science, it violates the law.

The hidden story of Britain’s ‘snowbabies’
London Telegraph
There are tens of thousands of 'spare' IVF embryos currently in storage in Britain, but parents face an agonising choice…

Letting Go
New Yorker
What should medicine do when it can’t save your life? asks Atul Gawande

The New Abortion Providers
New York Times
Women are entering the increasingly lonely field


 Recent Posts
Federal embryonic stem cell research funding stopped by black-letter judge
28 Aug 2010
Someday embryos will not be needed, says leading researcher
28 Aug 2010
Hollywood’s warning on designer babies
28 Aug 2010
Are IVF sons inheriting infertility from their dads?
28 Aug 2010
UK fertility watchdog considers sperm and egg market
28 Aug 2010

 Archive
Aug 2010 | Jul 2010 | Jun 2010 | more >>

 Tags
enhancement, eugenics, euthanasia, Peter Singer, abortion, Academy Awards, adult stem cells, Africa, age limit, ageing population, Alaska, Alcor, Alzheimer's, Alzheimer's disease, amputation, anatomy, animal rights, anti-ageing, Argentina, artificial insemination, assisted suicide, Australia, autism, autonomy, BDD, Belgium, Benedict XVI, bestiality, BioEdge, bioethics, bioethics commission, bioethics commissions, bioethics council, bioethics legislation, birth certificates, birth defects, black market, blood donation, body scans, brain death, brain scan, brain scans, bungles, Canada, castration, Catholic bioethics, Catholic Church, children of sperm donors, China, circumcision, clinical research, clinical trials, cloning, coma, commercialization, commercialization of medicine, compassion, confidentiality, Connecticut, consciousness, consumer genetics, consumerism, contraceptive pill, corruption, cosmetic surgery, courts, criminal activity, cryonics, deaf community, death angels, death panels, death penalty, dementia, designer babies, determinism, Dignitas, disabilities, disability, disabled, discrimination, DNA data base, DNA tests, doctor-patient relationship, donation after cardiac death, donor anonymity, Down syndrome, egg donation, elder abuse, elder care, elderly, Elena Kagan, embryo adoption, embryo screening, embryonic stem cells, embyronic stem cells, end of life issues, end-of-life care, enhancement, Enlightenment, equality, ESC, euthanasia, evolutionary psychology, face transplant, Facebook, facilitated communication, faith, Falun Gong, family planning, female genital mutilation, FEN, fertility, fertility tourism, films, fMRI, fMRI scans, foetal pain, France, Francis Collins, fraud, free will, futile care, future of bioethics, gay rights, gender, gender identity, gender reassignment, gene patents, gene therapy, genetic determinism, genetic diseases, genetic engineering, genetic parentage, genetic screening, genetic testing, genetic tests, genetics, geoengineering, Germany, global warming, GMC, Guatemala, hallucinogens, healthcare, healthcare rationing, HFEA, Hollywood, Hong Kong, hospital visitation, human dignity, human drama, human genome, human nature, human rights, ICSI, India, infant euthanasia, infanticide, infertility, infertility drugs, informed consent, internet, interviews, iPS, iPS cells, Ireland, Israel, IVF, IVF blunders, IVF human drama, Jack Kevorkian, Julian Savulescu, Kevorkian, Korea, law, Leon Kass, lesbian motherhood, lethal injection, libertarianism, lie detection, life extension, living wills, locked-in syndrome, Ludwig Minelli, malpractice, meaning of life, media, medical records, medical tourism, mercy killing, minimal consciousness, misconduct, morality, multiple births, multiple sclerosis, Myriad, Nazi, Nebraska, negligence, Netherlands, neuroethics, neuroscience, New Zealand, NHS, Nigeria, Nitschke, nurses, nursing homes, nutrition and hydration, Obama, obesity, OctoMom, older mothers, one-child policy, Oregon, organ donation, organ market, organ markets, organ theft, organ trafficking, organ transplant, organ transplants, pain relief, palliative care, pandemic, patient care, peer review, performance-enhancing drugs, personal identity, personalized medicine, personhood, Peru, Peter Singer, PGD, Philip Nitschke, plastination, politicization of science, politics, population control, posthumous conception, posthumuous sperm donation, prenatal testing, primum non nocere, principalism, privacy, profession conduct, professional ethics, professional misconduct, psychiatry, public health, public relations, publicity, PVS, Quebec, record keeping, regulation, reproductive rights, research misconduct, respect for dead, rights of the child, Russia, same-sex couples, Savulescu, science, Scotland, selective reduction, sex ratio, sex reassignment, sex selection, social infertility, social networking media, sperm donation, sperm donors, sport, sports, stem cell research, stem cells, sterilization, stories, suicide, suicide tourism, surrogacy, swine flu, Switzerland, synthetic biology, telemedicine, Terri Schiavo, terrorism, The Onion, three-parent embryos, torture, transhumanism, transplant surgery, UK, US, US Supreme Court, utilitarianism, vaccination, vegetative state, Wakefield, war on terror, wisdom of repugnance, World Medical Association, wrongful birth, YouTube, yuck factor,