April
23
  2:03:00 PM

“Moral character” not relevant for Massachusetts doctors

"Moral character" should not be a criterion for fitness to practice medicine in Massachusetts, says the head of the Massachusetts Medical Society. Dr Bruce Auerbach, its president-elect, says that this government proposal, amongst others, would give the state board of medicine too much power over licensing and disciplining. The state’s Board of Registration in Medicine says that "lack of good moral character" based on behaviour within or outside of medical practice would be grounds for sanctions.

The soon-to-retire director of the Board, Nancy Achin Audesse, told the Boston Globe that this was not a new requirement. "The privilege of holding a medical license requires not only technical skills, but high levels of ethics and morals." It is also consistent with the Board’s mission, Audesse contends. "To protect healthcare quality, patients and doctors rely on us to ensure that doctors who practice here are qualified and competent." ~ Boston Globe, Apr 19



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Neuroscience as the military’s new weapon
9 Feb 2012
Single-embryo transfers? Fugedaboudit, says NY IVF doctor
9 Feb 2012
Dutch celebrate a decade of euthanasia with a film festival
6 Feb 2012
Lost in surrogacy’s Bermuda Triangle
3 Feb 2012
Scores of UK patients die with bedsores, infections and malnutrition
3 Feb 2012

 Tags
Australia, animal rights, organ donation, Down syndrome, clinical trials, India, human drama, bioethics, genetic testing, Canada, surrogacy, assisted suicide, IVF, research, neuroscience, law, euthanasia, HFEA, China, stem cells, suicide, US, embryonic stem cells, commercialization, sperm donation, Netherlands, UK, abortion, organ trafficking, informed consent,