April
23
  2:03:00 PM

“Moral character” not relevant for Massachusetts doctors

"Moral character" should not be a criterion for fitness to practice medicine in Massachusetts, says the head of the Massachusetts Medical Society. Dr Bruce Auerbach, its president-elect, says that this government proposal, amongst others, would give the state board of medicine too much power over licensing and disciplining. The state’s Board of Registration in Medicine says that "lack of good moral character" based on behaviour within or outside of medical practice would be grounds for sanctions.

The soon-to-retire director of the Board, Nancy Achin Audesse, told the Boston Globe that this was not a new requirement. "The privilege of holding a medical license requires not only technical skills, but high levels of ethics and morals." It is also consistent with the Board’s mission, Audesse contends. "To protect healthcare quality, patients and doctors rely on us to ensure that doctors who practice here are qualified and competent." ~ Boston Globe, Apr 19




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Tags
US, Australia, surrogacy, sex selection, China, Down syndrome, sperm donation, embryonic stem cells, commercialization, research, organ transplants, human drama, assisted suicide, stem cells, UK, organ trafficking, suicide, India, bioethics, neuroscience, law, euthanasia, Canada, abortion, IVF, informed consent, clinical trials, genetic testing, organ donation, Netherlands,