March
03
 

Judge who ordered abortion says it was justified

A Massachusetts judge who ordered an abortion and sterilisation for a pregnant woman with schizophrenia earlier this year has vigorously defended her decision. Christina Harms, who retired from the bench last month after 23 years, made a rare public defence. She concluded that the woman, a 31-year-old who suffered from delusions due to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, would choose to abort her child if she were mentally competent. “I believed then, as I do now, that she would elect to abort the pregnancy to protect her own well-being,’’ she said. “She would want to be healthy.’’

An appeals court reversed Judge Harms’ decision two months ago. Speaking out against this decision, Harms described the case as “a tragic set of circumstances for which no outcome would have been easy or obviously correct.’’ She criticised the appeals court’s decision as simplistic and unfair. ~ Boston Globe, Feb 21




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Belgian intensive care doctors back involuntary euthanasia
11 Apr 2014
To freeze perchance to live
12 Apr 2014
British woman ‘weary of modern life’ euthanased in Switzerland
12 Apr 2014
The Lancet sounds alarm over care of the elderly
12 Apr 2014
Action needed on US doctors’ involvement in torture
12 Apr 2014

 Tags
genetic testing, bioethics, commercialization, Canada, organ trafficking, Australia, China, US, organ donation, Belgium, enhancement, euthanasia, Netherlands, India, abortion, neuroscience, informed consent, surrogacy, Julian Savulescu, Down syndrome, clinical trials, assisted suicide, stem cells, UK, sperm donation, IVF, Switzerland, human drama, suicide, law,