May
03
  1:08:57 AM

IVF blunders kept from public eye in UK

A series of IVF blunders in one of Britain’s leading hospitals was kept from the public by the country’s fertility watchdog. According an investigation by the London Sunday Times, embryos belonging to three couples were destroyed at Guy’s and St Thomas’ hospital in London this year after it was discovered that they had been created with the wrong sperm. And in 2007 a woman had a wrong embryo implanted. These mistakes occurred even though the same hospital had been warned in 2007 and 2008 that sperm samples were being prepared for fertilisation in a risky way.

Inspectors had noted: "The centre employs the practice of having all unprocessed sperm samples in the work area at one time." This was "not compliant" with HFEA rules, but the hospital's licence was still renewed without imposing any additional conditions.

There have been other disturbing errors. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority informed IVF clinics about them, but it did not make the incidents public. In one of these, a surrogate mother was given embryos from a couple whose surname resembled the couple who had hired her. The surrogate did not become pregnant. At another clinic, a woman was implanted with embryos belonging to a couple with the same surname. Treatment for two other couples had to be abandoned after their embryos were mixed up.

Josephine Quintavalle of the lobby group Comment on Reproductive Ethics, told the Times: "It is horrifying that this information is not available to the public. I didn’t realise the extent of this. The casualness is just dreadful." And the doyen of British IVF experts, Lord Robert Winston, commented: "It's a horrifying thing to happen once. You would have thought if it had happened before they would be absolutely scrupulous about making sure it didn't happen again."

Notwithstanding the errors, the HFEA has not carried out an investigation at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital. In fact, it seems unperturbed by the lurid revelations. IVF was a delicate procedure, was its comment, and it was impossible to eliminate human error. In the end, only 0.04% of treatments resulted in problems. "The HFEA takes incidents very seriously," it says. "When incidents are reported to us, we will investigate and take action where necessary. The risk of mix-ups is a serious concern for patients, clinics and the HFEA."

The revelations did not create many waves in the British media. But as Ms Quintavalle noted, "We don't even know if this is just the tip of the iceberg." The UK has the most highly regulated IVF industry in the world. What happens in the US and other countries is anyone’s guess. ~ London Sunday Times, Apr 26; Sun, Apr 27

 




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Tags
research, organ donation, UK, sex selection, Canada, India, bioethics, organ transplants, sperm donation, embryonic stem cells, assisted suicide, IVF, clinical trials, law, suicide, stem cells, organ trafficking, Australia, euthanasia, Down syndrome, genetic testing, commercialization, US, Netherlands, human drama, China, abortion, informed consent, neuroscience, surrogacy,