October
03
  2:56:02 AM

IRS in sex-change surgery debate

The American tax office has been dragged into the debate over whether sex-changes are genuine medical treatment or an inappropriate response to a psychological problem. Rhianon O'Donnabhain, a construction engineer from Boston, decided to become a woman in 2001 after having fathered three children. He claimed a US$5,000 tax deduction for the surgery, which the Internal Revenue Service initially allowed. However, the IRS quickly reversed its decision because the operation had been merely cosmetic, and therefore not deductible. O'Donnabhain refused and sued the IRS. The case is now making its way through the courts.

O'Donnabhain, now 64, is supported by the Boston-based Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders as a test case. A psychiatrist at Harvard Medical School, Marshall Forstein, says that an operation is clearly medically necessary. "When did the IRS suddenly become physicians? It's absolutely clear that transgender identity is a condition discussed in diagnostic manuals. It seems the IRS is now in the business of practicing medicine without a licence."


 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Tags
Netherlands, China, US, commercialization, research, abortion, surrogacy, IVF, embryonic stem cells, sperm donation, informed consent, India, Down syndrome, suicide, Australia, clinical trials, stem cells, neuroscience, human drama, euthanasia, law, organ transplants, organ donation, bioethics, UK, organ trafficking, assisted suicide, genetic testing, Canada, sex selection,