October
24
  2:54:02 AM

DROPPING THE WORD “CLONING”

The word "cloning" gives the public bad vibes, say biologists who support cloning of the therapeutic variety. They are trying to substitute the clumsier technical term "somatic cell nuclear transfer". The word "cloning" would be reserved for attempts to create a human baby and not a human embryo.

And the change works. Kathy Hudson, of the Genetics and Public Policy Center in Washington DC found that while only 29% of people surveyed approved of "cloning", 46% approved of "SCNT". But the change doesn't work altogether as expected. When people were asked whether they approved of creating babies with cloning, only 10% agreed. But when asked about creating babies with SCNT, the approval rating more than doubled, to 26%.


 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Tags
Down syndrome, bioethics, commercialization, clinical trials, human drama, research, stem cells, sex selection, China, embryonic stem cells, US, IVF, genetic testing, UK, Netherlands, informed consent, organ trafficking, suicide, organ donation, surrogacy, law, neuroscience, assisted suicide, abortion, sperm donation, organ transplants, euthanasia, Australia, India, Canada,