January
16
  2:58:02 AM

DISABILITY ACTIVISTS PROTEST “ASHLEY TREATMENT”

Stunting the growth of a severely physically and intellectually disabled American girl has been denounced by disability activists. As reported in last week's BioEdge, doctors in Seattle limited the height of six-year-old Ashley, and removed her breast buds, her uterus and her appendix. Their aim was to help the girl's parents cope with caring for her.

Media coverage has provoked a storm of controversy. Complaints have been filed with the federal Office for Human Research Protections, although the agency says that it has no authority to investigate it. Steven Taylor, of Syracuse University, said that "it is unethical and unacceptable to perform intrusive and invasive medical procedures on a person or child with a disability simply to make the person easier to care for."

The fact that a hospital ethics committee had reviewed the case did not impress the Chicago group Not Dead Yet. It called for a total ban on the "Ashley Treatment". "Ethics committees are not a substitute for the constitutionally-guaranteed right of due process," it declared in a press release. "In fact, they often act an an end-run around those protections."


 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Tags
human drama, commercialization, clinical trials, organ trafficking, India, organ transplants, Netherlands, bioethics, embryonic stem cells, informed consent, research, stem cells, neuroscience, euthanasia, IVF, organ donation, genetic testing, US, assisted suicide, sperm donation, China, surrogacy, UK, suicide, Down syndrome, sex selection, Australia, abortion, Canada, law,