August
28
  6:12:29 PM

Someday embryos will not be needed, says leading researcher

Rudolph JaenischThere is more spin in discussions of embryonic stem cells than in the average gyroscope. Even eminent scientists tend to glide over the disadvantages of their preferred cell type. But quite consistently throughout years of debate, four uses for these cells have been mentioned: curing dread diseases, testing drugs, doing genetic research, and benchmarking performance. What no scientist in favour of using them has ever mentioned is that someday they would no longer be needed.

Until now. Dr Rudolph Jaenisch, a leading and often-quoted researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told the New York Times that scientists currently need embryonic stem cells to benchmark the performance of adult stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. But then he admitted that this would not be the case for ever. “Things are very much in flux,” he said. “We will probably need human embryonic stem cells for a while. And then we probably will not need them anymore.”  ~ New York Times, Aug 25



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Lost in surrogacy’s Bermuda Triangle
3 Feb 2012
Scores of UK patients die with bedsores, infections and malnutrition
3 Feb 2012
Crackdown on illegal abortions restores Taiwan sex ratio
3 Feb 2012
Immigrant dad will miss out on transplant
3 Feb 2012
North Carolina may compensate victims of eugenics program
2 Feb 2012

 Tags
Netherlands, organ donation, human drama, genetic testing, sperm donation, HFEA, US, stem cells, assisted suicide, clinical trials, bioethics, Australia, research, law, sex selection, embryonic stem cells, informed consent, euthanasia, China, commercialization, organ trafficking, abortion, UK, Canada, suicide, neuroscience, IVF, surrogacy, Down syndrome, India,