June
11
  6:17:47 PM

Connecticut judge dismisses assisted suicide case

A request by two doctors seeking to prescribe lethal medication to mentally competent terminal patients who asked for help to die has been rejected by a Connecticut Superior Court judge.

Judge Julia Aurigemma declared that a state law prohibiting assisting suicide applied to physicians helping dying patients to end their lives. The issue should be solved by the legislature not the courts.

The doctors’ contention was that helping terminally ill patients end their lives was “aid in dying” rather than suicide. Suicide was a choice of whether or not to die, whereas aid in dying involved a choice of when a patient should die, and how much pain and suffering the patient should experience first.

Kathryn Tucker, legal director for US end-of-life care advocacy group Compassion & Choices, said it was “a bit perplexing” that Aurigemma’s ruling addressed the merits of the case, despite the fact that the plaintiffs had not been able to fully argue on those merits. ~ Hartford Courant, Jun 8



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Neuroscience as the military’s new weapon
9 Feb 2012
Single-embryo transfers? Fugedaboudit, says NY IVF doctor
9 Feb 2012
Dutch celebrate a decade of euthanasia with a film festival
6 Feb 2012
Lost in surrogacy’s Bermuda Triangle
3 Feb 2012
Scores of UK patients die with bedsores, infections and malnutrition
3 Feb 2012

 Tags
UK, informed consent, commercialization, Australia, stem cells, euthanasia, Netherlands, neuroscience, organ donation, human drama, assisted suicide, bioethics, surrogacy, clinical trials, embryonic stem cells, organ trafficking, genetic testing, US, HFEA, sperm donation, sex selection, abortion, law, research, India, China, Canada, IVF, Down syndrome, suicide,