May
14
  4:42:45 PM

Walgreens withdraws over-the-counter genetic test

Only a few days after Walgreens, America’s largest chain of pharmacies, announced that it would sell over-the-counter genetic testing, it has withdrawn the product. The Food and Drug Administration published an open letter questioning the legality of the testing kit, Insight, a product of Pathway Genomics, a San Diego-based start-up.

Pathway already sells genetic tests on-line, like 23andMe and Navigenics. Although the tests are controversial because consumers are unlikely to interpret them correctly, US law is vague. The FDA has not decided whether the tests are unregulated commercial information, or regulated medical devices.

"These kits have not been proven safe, effective or accurate, and patients could be making medical decisions based on data from a test that hasn't been validated by the FDA," said an FDA spokeswoman this week. Walgreens has deferred marketing the product "until we have further clarity on this matter."

There is little doubt about the commercial potential of consumer genetic tests in the era of personalised medicine. "We recognize that for some people, genetic responses are becoming a more important component of managing their health care," said Jim Cohn, a spokesman for Walgreens. "There are people who want to know more about their genetic makeup, and we pride ourselves on being convenient and accessible."

The Insight genetic test kit was to cost between US$20 to $30. Consumers would send a sample of their saliva to a Pathway Genomics laboratory and receive their results online. The report was to cost $79 to $179, depending on the type of test requested.

Some bioethicists were sceptical about the value of the tests. If the results seemed good, they could make consumers overconfident. If they seemed bad, they could alarm them needlessly. "It is reckless," Hank Greely, director of Stanford University's Center for Law and the Biosciences, told the Washington Post. "Information is powerful, but misunderstood information can be powerfully bad." ~ aol.com, May 13




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Tags
surrogacy, neuroscience, euthanasia, Down syndrome, informed consent, sex selection, China, assisted suicide, IVF, stem cells, sperm donation, genetic testing, research, India, embryonic stem cells, UK, Canada, Netherlands, organ transplants, suicide, US, organ donation, abortion, organ trafficking, human drama, commercialization, Australia, bioethics, law, clinical trials,