Although several reports have appeared that
Australia’s ban on couples choosing the sex of their children either for social
reasons or to balance their families may soon be lifted, a bioethicist has
described them as “a pre-emptive attempt to sway public opinion”. Dr Kevin
McGovern, of the Caroline Chisholm Centre for Health Ethics in Melbourne, says
that although many people want another child of the opposite sex, most feel
intuitively that there is something wrong with sex selection.
The chairwoman of the government’s peak medical ethics body, Dr
Sandra Hacker, has also observed that previous consultations have found the “majority
of Australians” opposed. And Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon has declared that
“the government has not set down this path because we wish to make any
changes”. She added: “And, at a personal level, I am very uncomfortable about
the suggestions that such a change might be made.” Dr McGovern’s prediction is
that a change in the current ban is unlikely. ~ Eureka
Street, Apr 8
Consequences of the Bio-Medical Revolution
May 1, 2010, Biola University, La Mirada, CA
Helping nurses understand technological advances in health care and their ethical consequences.
Fertility, Infertility and Gender
June 16-18, 2010, Maynooth, Ireland (near Dublin)
Sponsored by the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Oxford.
Obama’s Illegal Stem-Cell Policy
Public Discourse
Obama’s stem-cell policy is not only contrary to sound reason and good science, it violates the law.
The hidden story of Britain’s ‘snowbabies’
London Telegraph
There are tens of thousands of 'spare' IVF embryos currently in storage in Britain, but parents face an agonising choice…
Letting Go
New Yorker
What should medicine do when it can’t save your life? asks Atul Gawande