April
10
  11:15:49 PM

Sex selection unlikely in Australia, says bioethicist

Although several reports have appeared that Australia’s ban on couples choosing the sex of their children either for social reasons or to balance their families may soon be lifted, a bioethicist has described them as “a pre-emptive attempt to sway public opinion”. Dr Kevin McGovern, of the Caroline Chisholm Centre for Health Ethics in Melbourne, says that although many people want another child of the opposite sex, most feel intuitively that there is something wrong with sex selection.

The  chairwoman of the government’s peak medical ethics body, Dr Sandra Hacker, has also observed that previous consultations have found the “majority of Australians” opposed. And Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon has declared that “the government has not set down this path because we wish to make any changes”. She added: “And, at a personal level, I am very uncomfortable about the suggestions that such a change might be made.” Dr McGovern’s prediction is that a change in the current ban is unlikely. ~ Eureka Street, Apr 8



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Lost in surrogacy’s Bermuda Triangle
3 Feb 2012
Scores of UK patients die with bedsores, infections and malnutrition
3 Feb 2012
Crackdown on illegal abortions restores Taiwan sex ratio
3 Feb 2012
Immigrant dad will miss out on transplant
3 Feb 2012
North Carolina may compensate victims of eugenics program
2 Feb 2012

 Tags
surrogacy, Canada, research, China, UK, organ trafficking, sperm donation, neuroscience, clinical trials, stem cells, India, suicide, euthanasia, abortion, assisted suicide, sex selection, informed consent, human drama, commercialization, law, genetic testing, Down syndrome, organ donation, bioethics, IVF, HFEA, embryonic stem cells, Australia, US, Netherlands,