April
02
  10:21:01 PM

Can neuroscience be both ethical and rich?

In nearly any medical research, there’s a buck to be made somewhere. This is also true of the promising field of neuroscience. As John Horgan points out in a guest blog in Scientific American, “Of all scientific fields, neuroscience has the greatest potential for revolutionary advances, philosophical and practical.”

However, Horgan, a well-known science writer, is dismayed by the growing commercialization of neuroscience. In the first place, leading neuroscientists are trying to interest the military in their work. Last year, he says, the National Academy of Sciences published a 136-page report, Opportunities in Neuroscience for Future Army Applications, that makes “an unabashed pitch for militarizing brain research”. And then there are the snake oil salesmen who are marketing programs which are “clinically proven” to help customers think more clearly, think faster and remember more.

Horgan says, with some distaste, “Neuroscientists are attempting to solve the most profound secrets of human existence. They should adhere to higher ethical standards than defense contractors and infomercial pitchmen.” ~ Scientific American, Mar 24



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Neuroscience as the military’s new weapon
9 Feb 2012
Single-embryo transfers? Fugedaboudit, says NY IVF doctor
9 Feb 2012
Dutch celebrate a decade of euthanasia with a film festival
6 Feb 2012
Lost in surrogacy’s Bermuda Triangle
3 Feb 2012
Scores of UK patients die with bedsores, infections and malnutrition
3 Feb 2012

 Tags
Netherlands, India, commercialization, US, embryonic stem cells, genetic testing, law, animal rights, organ trafficking, stem cells, bioethics, UK, IVF, suicide, Australia, euthanasia, informed consent, abortion, research, Canada, Down syndrome, sperm donation, neuroscience, surrogacy, clinical trials, human drama, HFEA, China, organ donation, assisted suicide,