April
02
  10:21:01 PM

Can neuroscience be both ethical and rich?

In nearly any medical research, there’s a buck to be made somewhere. This is also true of the promising field of neuroscience. As John Horgan points out in a guest blog in Scientific American, “Of all scientific fields, neuroscience has the greatest potential for revolutionary advances, philosophical and practical.”

However, Horgan, a well-known science writer, is dismayed by the growing commercialization of neuroscience. In the first place, leading neuroscientists are trying to interest the military in their work. Last year, he says, the National Academy of Sciences published a 136-page report, Opportunities in Neuroscience for Future Army Applications, that makes “an unabashed pitch for militarizing brain research”. And then there are the snake oil salesmen who are marketing programs which are “clinically proven” to help customers think more clearly, think faster and remember more.

Horgan says, with some distaste, “Neuroscientists are attempting to solve the most profound secrets of human existence. They should adhere to higher ethical standards than defense contractors and infomercial pitchmen.” ~ Scientific American, Mar 24




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Tags
research, suicide, India, Australia, sex selection, stem cells, euthanasia, assisted suicide, bioethics, neuroscience, commercialization, IVF, sperm donation, UK, embryonic stem cells, Netherlands, surrogacy, law, US, organ donation, genetic testing, informed consent, organ trafficking, human drama, Down syndrome, clinical trials, organ transplants, China, abortion, Canada,