March
20
  10:18:09 AM

Push to allow sex selection in Australia

Facebook   Twitter   Share
tags: sex selection

It may soon be possible for Australian couples to choose the sex of their child for cultural reasons or to balance out the gender ratio in their family. Regulations on sex selection technology are being reviewed by the nation’s health watchdog, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), with many doctors pushing for the contentious issue to become more readily available.

Professor Gab Kovacs, pioneer of the IVF industry, believes that since the procedure is so expensive (with treatments costing between A$10,000 and $15,000), only the most determined will seek it.

“If I am prepared to pay for it out of my own pocket I can’t understand why that should be forbidden,” he told Sydney’s Daily Telegraph last week.

“It might even be in the best interests of the child. If a couple so badly want a boy or a girl that they are prepared to go through IVF and gender selection then maybe, if they had the child naturally and it was the wrong gender it may not be looked after as well.”

The use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is currently only permitted for medical reasons, where parents carry serious genetic diseases and defects that are only inheritable by children of one gender. However, the five-year moratorium placed on the widespread use of sex selection is set to expire this year. Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon does not support the idea. She told the ABC: “the [state and federal] governments had not set down the path because we want to make any changes, and at a personal level I'm very uncomfortable about the suggestions that a change might be made." However the Australian IVF industry is a formidable lobbyist and could get its way. ~ Daily Telegraph, Mar 13; ABC, Mar 13



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
get posts by email or
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 upcoming events

10th World Congress of Bioethics
July 28-31, 2010, Singapore
Bioethics in a Globalised World

Created in the Image of God: realities and challenges in caring for the human person
April 30 - May 2, 2010, Montreal
AGM of Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians’ Societies; featured speakers include Edmund Pellegrino and Margaret Somerville.

Consequences of the Bio-Medical Revolution
May 1, 2010, Biola University, La Mirada, CA
Helping nurses understand technological advances in health care and their ethical consequences.

Fertility, Infertility and Gender
June 16-18, 2010, Maynooth, Ireland (near Dublin)
Sponsored by the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Oxford.

Choice: do we have any?
July 1-4, 2010, Adelaide, South Australia
The inaugural annual Conference of the Australasian Association of Bioethics and Health Law


 Best of the web

The New Abortion Providers
New York Times
Women are entering the increasingly lonely field

How the New Healthcare Law Endangers Conscience
Public Discourse
... which seems to be forgotten.

Death doctor Howard Martin and Dignity in Dying
London Telegraph
...have more in common with Harold Shipman than they care to admit

A Singular Kind of Eugenics
BioPolitical Times
What the Gray Lady forgot to mention about the Singularity

Merely human? That’s so yesterday.
New York Times
The Gray Lady discovered transhumanism.


 Recent Posts
German anatomists confront Nazi past
24 Jul 2010
Many doctors fail to report dangerous colleagues
24 Jul 2010
UK schoolgirl wants leg amputated to become para-olympian
24 Jul 2010
Octomom’s doc accused of implanting 7 embryos
24 Jul 2010
Reprogrammed stem cells may be limited, researchers say
24 Jul 2010

 Archive
Jul 2010 | Jun 2010 | May 2010 | more >>

 Tags
enhancement, eugenics, euthanasia, Peter Singer, abortion, Academy Awards, adult stem cells, age limit, ageing population, Alaska, Alcor, Alzheimer's disease, amputation, anatomy, animal rights, anti-ageing, Argentina, artificial insemination, assisted suicide, Australia, autism, autonomy, Belgium, Benedict XVI, bestiality, BioEdge, bioethics, bioethics commission, bioethics commissions, bioethics council, birth certificates, birth defects, black market, blood donation, brain death, brain scan, brain scans, bungles, Canada, castration, Catholic bioethics, Catholic Church, children of sperm donors, China, clinical research, clinical trials, cloning, coma, commercialization, commercialization of medicine, compassion, confidentiality, Connecticut, consciousness, consumer genetics, consumerism, contraceptive pill, corruption, cosmetic surgery, courts, criminal activity, cryonics, deaf community, death angels, death panels, death penalty, dementia, designer babies, determinism, Dignitas, disabilities, disability, discrimination, DNA data base, DNA tests, doctor-patient relationship, donation after cardiac death, Down syndrome, egg donation, elder abuse, elder care, elderly, Elena Kagan, embryo adoption, embryo screening, embryonic stem cells, embyronic stem cells, end of life issues, end-of-life care, enhancement, ESC, euthanasia, Facebook, facilitated communication, faith, Falun Gong, family planning, female genital mutilation, FEN, fertility, fertility tourism, films, fMRI, fMRI scans, foetal pain, France, Francis Collins, fraud, free will, futile care, future of bioethics, gay rights, gender, gender identity, gender reassignment, gene patents, gene therapy, genetic determinism, genetic diseases, genetic engineering, genetic parentage, genetic screening, genetic testing, genetic tests, genetics, geoengineering, Germany, global warming, GMC, Guatemala, hallucinogens, healthcare, healthcare rationing, HFEA, Hollywood, hospital visitation, human dignity, human drama, human genome, human nature, human rights, ICSI, India, infant euthanasia, infanticide, infertility, infertility drugs, informed consent, internet, interviews, iPS, iPS cells, Ireland, Israel, IVF, IVF blunders, IVF human drama, Jack Kevorkian, Kevorkian, Korea, Leon Kass, lesbian motherhood, lethal injection, libertarianism, lie detection, life extension, living wills, Ludwig Minelli, malpractice, meaning of life, media, medical records, medical tourism, mercy killing, minimal consciousness, misconduct, multiple births, multiple sclerosis, Myriad, Nazi, Nebraska, negligence, Netherlands, neuroethics, neuroscience, New Zealand, NHS, Nigeria, Nitschke, nurses, nursing homes, nutrition and hydration, Obama, obesity, OctoMom, older mothers, one-child policy, Oregon, organ donation, organ market, organ markets, organ theft, organ trafficking, organ transplant, organ transplants, pain relief, palliative care, pandemic, patient care, peer review, performance-enhancing drugs, personal identity, personalized medicine, personhood, Peru, Peter Singer, PGD, Philip Nitschke, plastination, politicization of science, politics, population control, posthumuous sperm donation, prenatal testing, primum non nocere, principalism, privacy, profession conduct, professional misconduct, psychiatry, public health, public relations, publicity, PVS, Quebec, record keeping, regulation, reproductive rights, respect for dead, rights of the child, Russia, same-sex couples, Savulescu, science, Scotland, selective reduction, sex ratio, sex reassignment, sex selection, social infertility, social networking media, sperm donation, sperm donors, sport, sports, stem cell research, stem cells, sterilization, stories, suicide, suicide tourism, surrogacy, swine flu, Switzerland, synthetic biology, telemedicine, Terri Schiavo, The Onion, three-parent embryos, torture, transhumanism, transplant surgery, UK, US, US Supreme Court, utilitarianism, vaccination, vegetative state, Wakefield, war on terror, wisdom of repugnance, World Medical Association, wrongful birth, YouTube, yuck factor,