March
08
  3:16:21 PM

Swiss decide their animals don’t need lawyers

Just over 70% of Swiss voters have rejected a referendum proposal to give animals lawyers who would represent them in court. All 26 cantons voted against the move by animal rights activists. In some cantons, the No vote was more than 80%. Although this system is already in place in Zurich, the Swiss clearly thought that it was too expensive and too bizarre to be extended to the whole country. All of the cantons would have been forced to engage animal advocates.

 The president of the Swiss Farmers' Union, Hansjorg Walter, said: "Voters have taken a pragmatic decision and acknowledged that Switzerland has one of the strictest animal welfare laws. The Union wants proper enforcement of animal welfare. Violations harm the image of farmers. But there are stringent checks and penalties for misconduct are already severe." ~ London Telegraph, Mar 8



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Neuroscience as the military’s new weapon
9 Feb 2012
Single-embryo transfers? Fugedaboudit, says NY IVF doctor
9 Feb 2012
Dutch celebrate a decade of euthanasia with a film festival
6 Feb 2012
Lost in surrogacy’s Bermuda Triangle
3 Feb 2012
Scores of UK patients die with bedsores, infections and malnutrition
3 Feb 2012

 Tags
stem cells, abortion, organ trafficking, IVF, Down syndrome, law, human drama, euthanasia, US, research, China, UK, animal rights, Australia, HFEA, India, organ donation, embryonic stem cells, Canada, neuroscience, suicide, clinical trials, informed consent, genetic testing, bioethics, assisted suicide, surrogacy, Netherlands, commercialization, sperm donation,