March
08
  3:16:21 PM

Swiss decide their animals don’t need lawyers

Just over 70% of Swiss voters have rejected a referendum proposal to give animals lawyers who would represent them in court. All 26 cantons voted against the move by animal rights activists. In some cantons, the No vote was more than 80%. Although this system is already in place in Zurich, the Swiss clearly thought that it was too expensive and too bizarre to be extended to the whole country. All of the cantons would have been forced to engage animal advocates.

 The president of the Swiss Farmers' Union, Hansjorg Walter, said: "Voters have taken a pragmatic decision and acknowledged that Switzerland has one of the strictest animal welfare laws. The Union wants proper enforcement of animal welfare. Violations harm the image of farmers. But there are stringent checks and penalties for misconduct are already severe." ~ London Telegraph, Mar 8




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Indian surrogate for US woman dies in Gurjarat
18 May 2012
Do reproductive rights survive gender reassignment?
19 May 2012
South African activists begin euthanasia campaign
19 May 2012
70 assisted suicides in Washington state in 2011
19 May 2012
Would-be grandparents pay for their daughters’ egg freezing
19 May 2012

 Tags
organ transplants, human drama, sex selection, stem cells, organ trafficking, neuroscience, commercialization, Australia, euthanasia, bioethics, sperm donation, law, genetic testing, Netherlands, clinical trials, China, Canada, surrogacy, research, UK, assisted suicide, organ donation, Down syndrome, abortion, IVF, US, informed consent, embryonic stem cells, suicide, India,