December
17
  12:32:56 PM

Suicide kits as Christmas presents?

Australian euthanasia activist Dr Philip Nitschke is a busy man in the frantic days before the holiday season begins. He caused outrage this week when he claimed at a seminar on how to kill oneself that elderly couples were buying each other suicide kits as Christmas presents. As he anticipated, his remarks sparked angry responses from Christian and pro-life groups. "A pill to kill yourself and your loved one as a Christmas present is absolutely reprehensible," said Graham Preston, of the Queensland branch of Right to Life Australia.

Then, Dr Nitschke angrily denounced the Federal government for its plan to force internet service providers to filter objectionable material like child pornography and suicide manuals. "What the government is implementing with this mandatory Net censorship is the final act of more than a decade of preventing elderly and seriously ill Australians the right to determine the time and manner of their passing," he declared in a press release. He is now thinking of "seeking political asylum overseas".

And finally he had rare words of praise for a compassionate judge who gave a woman who had throttled her mother to death a two-year wholly suspended sentence because she sought to end her suffering. "The courts are acting compassionately in a situation where the law really gives little leeway or flexibility," Dr Nitschke commented. "I mean, it's an extremely light sentence for the crime of attempted murder, but it shows again that the courts are having to deal with a situation that the politicians simply can't seem to address." ~ Courier Mail (Brisbane), Dec 17

 

Bookmark and Share
 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
get posts by email or
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 upcoming events

Created in the Image of God: realities and challenges in caring for the human person
April 30 - May 2, 2010, Montreal
AGM of Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians’ Societies; featured speakers include Edmund Pellegrino and Margaret Somerville.

Consequences of the Bio-Medical Revolution
May 1, 2010, Biola University, La Mirada, CA
Helping nurses understand technological advances in health care and their ethical consequences.

Fertility, Infertility and Gender
June 16-18, 2010, Maynooth, Ireland (near Dublin)
Sponsored by the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Oxford.

Choice: do we have any?
July 1-4, 2010, Adelaide, South Australia
The inaugural annual Conference of the Australasian Association of Bioethics and Health Law


 Best of the web

A Mind of Crime
Miller-McClune
How brain-scanning technology is redefining criminal culpability.

‘Shock Me, Tube Me, Line Me’
Health Affairs
An emergency medicine specialist says that DNR orders are not a good idea.

Sympathectomy of the Soul
First Things
Excellent history of euthanasia in the Netherlands.

Are there ‘genes for’ traits?
BioNews
Does it make sense to speak of the gene for cystic fibrosis?

Are Sperm Donors Really Anonymous Anymore?
Slate
DNA testing makes them easy to trace.


 Recent Posts
BMJ editorial backs castration of sex offenders
12 Mar 2010
Reprogramming not so simple, stem cell researchers say
12 Mar 2010
The lucrative business of baby-making
12 Mar 2010
Disabled girl should be sterilised, says Australian court
12 Mar 2010
Head of NIH on science and faith
12 Mar 2010

 Archive
Mar 2010 | Feb 2010 | Jan 2010 | more >>

 Tags
animal rights, assisted suicide, bioethics, coma, Dignitas, embryonic stem cells, euthanasia, human dignity, ICSI, informed consent, IVF, Netherlands, organ donation, personhood,