"The mind is
what the brain does," according to Steven Pinker, Harvard's
celebrity neuropsychologist. We "are in fact no more than the
behavior of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated
molecules," according to the co-discoverer and Nobel laureate
Francis Crick. "You are your synapses," according to
neuroscientist Joseph LeDoux.
Neuro-reductionism,
the theory that we essentially are our brains, is the flavour of the
week in popular science. Which makes it all the more surprising that
the hottest article in the latest issue of the journal Bioethics
runs under the headline "Our Brains Are Not Us". Normally
in the vanguard of attacks on the reduction of personality to a
computer-like neural network are non-materialist philosophers. But
this study, by Walter Glannon, of the University of Calgary, takes a
different tack, something he calls "the distributed model of the
mind". "I challenge and reject neuro-reductionism by
arguing that the mind emerges from and is shaped by interaction among
the brain, body, and environment. The mind is not located in the
brain but is distributed among these three entities as the organism
engages with and constructs meaning from its surroundings."
Glannon points out
that although cognitive neuroscientists reject a dualist model of a
non-material mind and a material body, they fall into an equally
contentious theory -- brain-body dualism. This fails to appreciate
the effect of the body on the brain.
The mind is not a
disembodied brain in a vat of chemicals, as in some B-grade horror
films, he says. Transplanting a brain into a different body would not
preserve the identity of the person. In the words of German
neuro-philosopher Thomas Fuchs, "The brain is only an organ, and
it is not the brain, but the organism or the living person that has
conscious access to the world."
Glannon's article is
a reminder that neuro-reductionism has still not swept all opposition
aside. Some leading neuroscientists, notably Antonio Damasio, of the
University of Southern California, believe that the mind cannot be
reduced to neuronal processes. ~ Bioethics,
June
Consequences of the Bio-Medical Revolution
May 1, 2010, Biola University, La Mirada, CA
Helping nurses understand technological advances in health care and their ethical consequences.
Fertility, Infertility and Gender
June 16-18, 2010, Maynooth, Ireland (near Dublin)
Sponsored by the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Oxford.
Obama’s Illegal Stem-Cell Policy
Public Discourse
Obama’s stem-cell policy is not only contrary to sound reason and good science, it violates the law.
The hidden story of Britain’s ‘snowbabies’
London Telegraph
There are tens of thousands of 'spare' IVF embryos currently in storage in Britain, but parents face an agonising choice…
Letting Go
New Yorker
What should medicine do when it can’t save your life? asks Atul Gawande