November
10
  4:01:56 PM

Singapore to compensate kidney donors

Facebook   Twitter   Share
tags:

health minister Khaw Boon WanSingapore is to allow compensation for kidney transplants and for eggs. A government proposal has been approved by a bioethics committee and legislation will be introduced early next year. The committee declared that reimbursement for kidney donation was acceptable as long as it is not "an undue inducement, nor amounting to organ trading".

What exactly this means for kidneys is difficult to fathom. According to the BMJ, a sum of S$10,000 was mentioned. According to the Straits Times, the health minister, Mr Khaw Boon Wan, mentioned "at least a five-figure sum, possibly even six-figure" as appropriate reimbursement. This would include expenses, such as transport and medical costs, as well as loss of earnings. Also, the donor should be covered for follow-up medical costs and higher insurance premiums as a result of losing a kidney.

Although Singapore is eager to become a hub for medical tourism, the government does not want to become tainted by a black market in organ trading. Back in July a retail magnate was convicted for trying to buy a kidney for S$23,700. He spent a day in jail and was fined S$17,000. The donors – poor Indonesian labourers -- were given two weeks' jail and a $1,000 fine and 14 weeks' jail and a S$2,000 fine.

The committee has recommended that the reimbursement scheme begin with donors who are Singapore citizens and permanent residents. About 600 patients in Singapore are awaiting kidney transplants. The minister claims that his scheme is ethical according to the standards of the World Health Organisation.

The government also plans to authorise payment for eggs in order to facilitate embryo research and therapeutic cloning. According to the Straits Times, its bioethics advisory committee believes that “fair compensation would encourage women to come forward to donate their eggs - among the most highly prized items for biomedical research. So far, no woman here has ever voluntarily donated her eggs purely for research.”

Compensation will be authorised only for loss of time and earnings. The government does not want to create a market in human eggs because of the danger of exploitation. 

Other changes to Singapore’s legislation are contemplated: lifting the age of dead donors, which is now capped at 60 and allowing paired donation, in which a donor whose kidney is not a match for a relative, gives it to someone else, who also has a relative willing to give up a kidney. ~ BMJ, Nov 7; Straits Times, Nov 1;



 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
get posts by email or
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 upcoming events

Passport to Parenthood: Evidence and Ethics behind Cross-Border Reproductive Care
November 24, 2010, London
Progress Educational Trust asks whether fertility tourism is a problem or a solution.

10th World Congress of Bioethics
July 28-31, 2010, Singapore
Bioethics in a Globalised World

Created in the Image of God: realities and challenges in caring for the human person
April 30 - May 2, 2010, Montreal
AGM of Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians’ Societies; featured speakers include Edmund Pellegrino and Margaret Somerville.

Consequences of the Bio-Medical Revolution
May 1, 2010, Biola University, La Mirada, CA
Helping nurses understand technological advances in health care and their ethical consequences.

Fertility, Infertility and Gender
June 16-18, 2010, Maynooth, Ireland (near Dublin)
Sponsored by the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Oxford.


 Best of the web

Artificially Conceiving a Bad Romantic Comedy
First Things
Why sperm donation generates Hollywood bombs.

Obama’s Illegal Stem-Cell Policy
Public Discourse
Obama’s stem-cell policy is not only contrary to sound reason and good science, it violates the law.

The hidden story of Britain’s ‘snowbabies’
London Telegraph
There are tens of thousands of 'spare' IVF embryos currently in storage in Britain, but parents face an agonising choice…

Letting Go
New Yorker
What should medicine do when it can’t save your life? asks Atul Gawande

The New Abortion Providers
New York Times
Women are entering the increasingly lonely field


 Recent Posts
Federal embryonic stem cell research funding stopped by black-letter judge
28 Aug 2010
Someday embryos will not be needed, says leading researcher
28 Aug 2010
Hollywood’s warning on designer babies
28 Aug 2010
Are IVF sons inheriting infertility from their dads?
28 Aug 2010
UK fertility watchdog considers sperm and egg market
28 Aug 2010

 Archive
Aug 2010 | Jul 2010 | Jun 2010 | more >>

 Tags
enhancement, eugenics, euthanasia, Peter Singer, abortion, Academy Awards, adult stem cells, Africa, age limit, ageing population, Alaska, Alcor, Alzheimer's, Alzheimer's disease, amputation, anatomy, animal rights, anti-ageing, Argentina, artificial insemination, assisted suicide, Australia, autism, autonomy, BDD, Belgium, Benedict XVI, bestiality, BioEdge, bioethics, bioethics commission, bioethics commissions, bioethics council, bioethics legislation, birth certificates, birth defects, black market, blood donation, body scans, brain death, brain scan, brain scans, bungles, Canada, castration, Catholic bioethics, Catholic Church, children of sperm donors, China, circumcision, clinical research, clinical trials, cloning, coma, commercialization, commercialization of medicine, compassion, confidentiality, Connecticut, consciousness, consumer genetics, consumerism, contraceptive pill, corruption, cosmetic surgery, courts, criminal activity, cryonics, deaf community, death angels, death panels, death penalty, dementia, designer babies, determinism, Dignitas, disabilities, disability, disabled, discrimination, DNA data base, DNA tests, doctor-patient relationship, donation after cardiac death, donor anonymity, Down syndrome, egg donation, elder abuse, elder care, elderly, Elena Kagan, embryo adoption, embryo screening, embryonic stem cells, embyronic stem cells, end of life issues, end-of-life care, enhancement, Enlightenment, equality, ESC, euthanasia, evolutionary psychology, face transplant, Facebook, facilitated communication, faith, Falun Gong, family planning, female genital mutilation, FEN, fertility, fertility tourism, films, fMRI, fMRI scans, foetal pain, France, Francis Collins, fraud, free will, futile care, future of bioethics, gay rights, gender, gender identity, gender reassignment, gene patents, gene therapy, genetic determinism, genetic diseases, genetic engineering, genetic parentage, genetic screening, genetic testing, genetic tests, genetics, geoengineering, Germany, global warming, GMC, Guatemala, hallucinogens, healthcare, healthcare rationing, HFEA, Hollywood, Hong Kong, hospital visitation, human dignity, human drama, human genome, human nature, human rights, ICSI, India, infant euthanasia, infanticide, infertility, infertility drugs, informed consent, internet, interviews, iPS, iPS cells, Ireland, Israel, IVF, IVF blunders, IVF human drama, Jack Kevorkian, Julian Savulescu, Kevorkian, Korea, law, Leon Kass, lesbian motherhood, lethal injection, libertarianism, lie detection, life extension, living wills, locked-in syndrome, Ludwig Minelli, malpractice, meaning of life, media, medical records, medical tourism, mercy killing, minimal consciousness, misconduct, morality, multiple births, multiple sclerosis, Myriad, Nazi, Nebraska, negligence, Netherlands, neuroethics, neuroscience, New Zealand, NHS, Nigeria, Nitschke, nurses, nursing homes, nutrition and hydration, Obama, obesity, OctoMom, older mothers, one-child policy, Oregon, organ donation, organ market, organ markets, organ theft, organ trafficking, organ transplant, organ transplants, pain relief, palliative care, pandemic, patient care, peer review, performance-enhancing drugs, personal identity, personalized medicine, personhood, Peru, Peter Singer, PGD, Philip Nitschke, plastination, politicization of science, politics, population control, posthumous conception, posthumuous sperm donation, prenatal testing, primum non nocere, principalism, privacy, profession conduct, professional ethics, professional misconduct, psychiatry, public health, public relations, publicity, PVS, Quebec, record keeping, regulation, reproductive rights, research misconduct, respect for dead, rights of the child, Russia, same-sex couples, Savulescu, science, Scotland, selective reduction, sex ratio, sex reassignment, sex selection, social infertility, social networking media, sperm donation, sperm donors, sport, sports, stem cell research, stem cells, sterilization, stories, suicide, suicide tourism, surrogacy, swine flu, Switzerland, synthetic biology, telemedicine, Terri Schiavo, terrorism, The Onion, three-parent embryos, torture, transhumanism, transplant surgery, UK, US, US Supreme Court, utilitarianism, vaccination, vegetative state, Wakefield, war on terror, wisdom of repugnance, World Medical Association, wrongful birth, YouTube, yuck factor,