August
28
  9:52:00 PM

IVF exploitation in India

Facebook   Twitter   Share
tags:

Predictions of exploitation of poor women by rich women who want surrogate babies seem to be coming true in India. Although hard statistics are lacking, Indian newspapers keep repeating that their country is becoming the surrogacy capital of the world. Whether or not this is true, a market exists for surrogate mothers and egg donors which has little to do with altruism.

According to one IVF doctor in Ahmedabad, Parul Kotdawala, “the physical characteristics of the donor, as per the demands of the prospective parents, play a decisive role in pricing. Since there are limited donors than buyers, the former are placed on a stronger footing in terms of dictating prices.”

However, other doctors describe a market in which the donor has the weaker hand. Gynaecologist Jagruti Sanghvi says: “There is a flourishing market for eggs in Ahmedabad. Agents are always on the prowl of probable donors.” Most professional donors come from the lower strata and do it purely for the money.

And if they are not willing, it appears that some, at least, are bullied into it by their husbands. “As their husbands are easy to convince, they are approached first,” says Dr Sanghvi. “However, with financial dealings involved in the process, husbands often force their will on their wives.”

There is very little regulation of the IVF industry in India – and existing guidelines are regularly ignored. The Indian Council of Medical Research stipulates that donation should be anonymous, but often doctors introduce the donor as a guarantee of their social profile and physical appearance. The donors are often kept in the dark about the potentially dangerous side-effects. And they are in no position to haggle.

One woman in Mumbai told DNAIndia that she wanted extra cash and decided to donate to a well-to-do couple and be “handsomely compensated”. But afterwards she was told that her eggs were not good enough and that she would be paid only 5,000 rupees (US$115). “I have no way of finding out if my eggs were really bad or if I was taken for a ride. I feel cheated,” she says. ~ ExpressIndia, Aug 24; DNAIndia, Aug 26




 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
get posts by email or
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 upcoming events

10th World Congress of Bioethics
July 28-31, 2010, Singapore
Bioethics in a Globalised World

Created in the Image of God: realities and challenges in caring for the human person
April 30 - May 2, 2010, Montreal
AGM of Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians’ Societies; featured speakers include Edmund Pellegrino and Margaret Somerville.

Consequences of the Bio-Medical Revolution
May 1, 2010, Biola University, La Mirada, CA
Helping nurses understand technological advances in health care and their ethical consequences.

Fertility, Infertility and Gender
June 16-18, 2010, Maynooth, Ireland (near Dublin)
Sponsored by the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Oxford.

Choice: do we have any?
July 1-4, 2010, Adelaide, South Australia
The inaugural annual Conference of the Australasian Association of Bioethics and Health Law


 Best of the web

The New Abortion Providers
New York Times
Women are entering the increasingly lonely field

How the New Healthcare Law Endangers Conscience
Public Discourse
... which seems to be forgotten.

Death doctor Howard Martin and Dignity in Dying
London Telegraph
...have more in common with Harold Shipman than they care to admit

A Singular Kind of Eugenics
BioPolitical Times
What the Gray Lady forgot to mention about the Singularity

Merely human? That’s so yesterday.
New York Times
The Gray Lady discovered transhumanism.


 Recent Posts
German anatomists confront Nazi past
24 Jul 2010
Many doctors fail to report dangerous colleagues
24 Jul 2010
UK schoolgirl wants leg amputated to become para-olympian
24 Jul 2010
Octomom’s doc accused of implanting 7 embryos
24 Jul 2010
Reprogrammed stem cells may be limited, researchers say
24 Jul 2010

 Archive
Jul 2010 | Jun 2010 | May 2010 | more >>

 Tags
enhancement, eugenics, euthanasia, Peter Singer, abortion, Academy Awards, adult stem cells, age limit, ageing population, Alaska, Alcor, Alzheimer's disease, amputation, anatomy, animal rights, anti-ageing, Argentina, artificial insemination, assisted suicide, Australia, autism, autonomy, Belgium, Benedict XVI, bestiality, BioEdge, bioethics, bioethics commission, bioethics commissions, bioethics council, birth certificates, birth defects, black market, blood donation, brain death, brain scan, brain scans, bungles, Canada, castration, Catholic bioethics, Catholic Church, children of sperm donors, China, clinical research, clinical trials, cloning, coma, commercialization, commercialization of medicine, compassion, confidentiality, Connecticut, consciousness, consumer genetics, consumerism, contraceptive pill, corruption, cosmetic surgery, courts, criminal activity, cryonics, deaf community, death angels, death panels, death penalty, dementia, designer babies, determinism, Dignitas, disabilities, disability, discrimination, DNA data base, DNA tests, doctor-patient relationship, donation after cardiac death, Down syndrome, egg donation, elder abuse, elder care, elderly, Elena Kagan, embryo adoption, embryo screening, embryonic stem cells, embyronic stem cells, end of life issues, end-of-life care, enhancement, ESC, euthanasia, Facebook, facilitated communication, faith, Falun Gong, family planning, female genital mutilation, FEN, fertility, fertility tourism, films, fMRI, fMRI scans, foetal pain, France, Francis Collins, fraud, free will, futile care, future of bioethics, gay rights, gender, gender identity, gender reassignment, gene patents, gene therapy, genetic determinism, genetic diseases, genetic engineering, genetic parentage, genetic screening, genetic testing, genetic tests, genetics, geoengineering, Germany, global warming, GMC, Guatemala, hallucinogens, healthcare, healthcare rationing, HFEA, Hollywood, hospital visitation, human dignity, human drama, human genome, human nature, human rights, ICSI, India, infant euthanasia, infanticide, infertility, infertility drugs, informed consent, internet, interviews, iPS, iPS cells, Ireland, Israel, IVF, IVF blunders, IVF human drama, Jack Kevorkian, Kevorkian, Korea, Leon Kass, lesbian motherhood, lethal injection, libertarianism, lie detection, life extension, living wills, Ludwig Minelli, malpractice, meaning of life, media, medical records, medical tourism, mercy killing, minimal consciousness, misconduct, multiple births, multiple sclerosis, Myriad, Nazi, Nebraska, negligence, Netherlands, neuroethics, neuroscience, New Zealand, NHS, Nigeria, Nitschke, nurses, nursing homes, nutrition and hydration, Obama, obesity, OctoMom, older mothers, one-child policy, Oregon, organ donation, organ market, organ markets, organ theft, organ trafficking, organ transplant, organ transplants, pain relief, palliative care, pandemic, patient care, peer review, performance-enhancing drugs, personal identity, personalized medicine, personhood, Peru, Peter Singer, PGD, Philip Nitschke, plastination, politicization of science, politics, population control, posthumuous sperm donation, prenatal testing, primum non nocere, principalism, privacy, profession conduct, professional misconduct, psychiatry, public health, public relations, publicity, PVS, Quebec, record keeping, regulation, reproductive rights, respect for dead, rights of the child, Russia, same-sex couples, Savulescu, science, Scotland, selective reduction, sex ratio, sex reassignment, sex selection, social infertility, social networking media, sperm donation, sperm donors, sport, sports, stem cell research, stem cells, sterilization, stories, suicide, suicide tourism, surrogacy, swine flu, Switzerland, synthetic biology, telemedicine, Terri Schiavo, The Onion, three-parent embryos, torture, transhumanism, transplant surgery, UK, US, US Supreme Court, utilitarianism, vaccination, vegetative state, Wakefield, war on terror, wisdom of repugnance, World Medical Association, wrongful birth, YouTube, yuck factor,