September
07
 

Feminist launches attack on the Pill

The Doctored Oath, video art from Jorden Williams

Female genital mutilation, abortion, egg harvesting and surrogacy are all practices which have bioethicists arguing vehemently on both sides. But the most common practice of all, controlling fertility with the contraceptive pill, is seldom discussed outside of some religious circles. Now it is coming in for some feminist blowback. (If you cannot see the video above, click here.)

Sweetening the Pill: or How We Got Hooked on Hormonal Birth Control, by English feminist writer Holly Grigg-Spall, is a passionate attack on hormonal contraceptives to be released later this month. Its promotional literature says:

“Contrary to cultural myth, the birth-control pill impacts on every organ and function of the body, and yet most women do not even think of it as a drug. Depression, anxiety, paranoia, rage, panic attacks - just a few of the effects of the Pill on half of the over 80% of women who pop these tablets during their lifetimes. When the Pill was released, it was thought that women would not submit to taking a medication each day when they were not sick. Now the Pill is making women sick.

“However, there are a growing number of women looking for non-hormonal alternatives for preventing pregnancy. In a bid to spark the backlash against hormonal contraceptives, this book asks: Why can't we criticize the Pill?”

The book has come under fire already. Writing in Slate, Lindsay Beyerstein ripped Grigg-Spall’s analysis to shreds.

“Sweetening the Pill is poorly researched, shoddily argued, and fundamentally incoherent… Grigg-Spall condescends to the millions of women who take the pill, claiming that we are dupes of pharma and feminism. The question is not whether there are trade-offs to the birth control pill, but whether the benefits justify the risks.”



This article is published by Michael Cook and BioEdge.org under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

comments powered by Disqus
 

 Search BioEdge

 Subscribe to BioEdge newsletter
rss Subscribe to BioEdge RSS feed

 Best of the web

 Recent Posts
Euthanasia in Australia, 20 years on
24 Sep 2016
New Down’s Syndrome test could save money, say British obstetricians
24 Sep 2016
Dutch could open child euthanasia clinic soon
24 Sep 2016
Leading bioethics editors attack conscientious objection
24 Sep 2016
What the experts think of malign superintelligence
24 Sep 2016